Romney Discloses He Urged Biden to Preemptively Pardon Trump to Avoid Political Retribution
Senator Mitt Romney revealed that he personally contacted senior White House staffers during the Biden administration to urge them to grant a preemptive pardon for Donald Trump — should federal charges be brought — in order to prevent perceived political retribution. Romney said that he made the request to forestall “anger, hatred, and hostility,” and to ensure “we simply cannot start persecuting political opponents.” (as reported via media summaries)
According to Romney’s account, he spoke to one of President Biden’s senior advisors, arguing that if the Justice Department pursued indictments against Trump, the clemency action should be immediate. He framed the pardon as a symbolic safeguard — a clear signal that the justice system should not be used as a weapon against political rivals. He added that such a step would demonstrate restraint and protect the integrity of institutions. In his telling, the White House did not take that path: “They didn’t do it,” Romney said.
This revelation comes amid heightened tensions over Trump’s past statements that he would prosecute critics if re-elected, and concerns about interference in the Department of Justice. Romney’s position attempts to walk a line: he has long been a critic of Trump’s conduct on many fronts, yet here he is advocating a form of clemency in the name of institutional balance. Earlier, he had publicly said that Biden should have pardoned Trump when federal charges were first announced — a stance he described as making Biden “the big guy” and preventing legal battles from overshadowing politics.
Critics might view Romney’s newly disclosed outreach as controversial: urging preemptive presidential action to stymie prosecution risks undermining prosecutorial independence and could be seen as political interference. Supporters, however, would argue it reflects an attempt to protect norms and prevent the legal system from becoming a tool of revenge. Romney’s remarks also add a new dimension to the debate over pardons, clemency, and the balance between justice and political stability.
Whether the Biden administration seriously considered Romney’s suggestion remains unclear. His disclosure raises questions about internal deliberations and whether any part of the executive branch weighed such clemency options behind closed doors. The episode may fuel further scrutiny over how political pressure and pardon powers intersect — and whether such interventions destabilize the norm that prosecutorial decisions should be made free from political influence.
Why It Matters
-
Shows how clemency powers can be invoked preemptively — not as retrospective mercy but as a political tool.
-
Highlights tensions between executive authority and DOJ independence.
-
Suggests even critics of Trump see risks in weaponizing the justice system.
-
Adds pressure on public discourse about when patronage, pardon, or clemency are appropriate.
-
Could complicate narratives around accountability, justice, and institutional integrity.
Key Social Outcomes
-
Raises public awareness that pardons may be used as political shields, not just rehabilitative or symbolic tools.
-
Provokes debate about fairness in the justice system and equal treatment under the law.
-
Could feed skepticism about whether legal decisions are truly impartial.
-
Signals to other political actors that preemptive maneuvers are on the table.
-
May deepen cynicism or polarization: some will view pardons from any angle as partisan, regardless of intent.
Publication Date & Outlet Link
- Reported recently in major media (e.g. CNN summaries)
- Link: Mitt Romney reveals he personally urged Biden administration to preemptively pardon Donald Trump — CNN (via its coverage)
